[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9441?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15046141#comment-15046141
 ] 

Mingliang Liu commented on HDFS-9441:
-------------------------------------

+1 (non-binding) to remove it.

> Do not construct path string when choosing block placement targets
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-9441
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9441
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: namenode
>            Reporter: Tsz Wo Nicholas Sze
>            Assignee: Tsz Wo Nicholas Sze
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: h9441_20151118.patch, h9441_20151119.patch
>
>
> - INodeFile.getName() is expensive since it involves quite a few string 
> operations.  The method is called in both ReplicationWork and 
> ErasureCodingWork but the default BlockPlacementPolicy does not use the 
> returned string.  We should simply pass BlockCollection to reduce unnecessary 
> computation when using the default BlockPlacementPolicy.
> - Another improvement: the return type of FSNamesystem.getBlockCollection 
> should be changed to INodeFile since it always returns an INodeFile object.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to