[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9441?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15046141#comment-15046141 ]
Mingliang Liu commented on HDFS-9441: ------------------------------------- +1 (non-binding) to remove it. > Do not construct path string when choosing block placement targets > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HDFS-9441 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9441 > Project: Hadoop HDFS > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: namenode > Reporter: Tsz Wo Nicholas Sze > Assignee: Tsz Wo Nicholas Sze > Priority: Minor > Attachments: h9441_20151118.patch, h9441_20151119.patch > > > - INodeFile.getName() is expensive since it involves quite a few string > operations. The method is called in both ReplicationWork and > ErasureCodingWork but the default BlockPlacementPolicy does not use the > returned string. We should simply pass BlockCollection to reduce unnecessary > computation when using the default BlockPlacementPolicy. > - Another improvement: the return type of FSNamesystem.getBlockCollection > should be changed to INodeFile since it always returns an INodeFile object. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)