[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9677?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jing Zhao updated HDFS-9677:
----------------------------
Resolution: Fixed
Hadoop Flags: Reviewed
Fix Version/s: 2.9.0
Target Version/s: (was: 3.0.0)
Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available)
Thanks for the branch-2 patch, Mingliang. I've committed this to trunk and
branch-2.
> Rename generationStampV1/generationStampV2 to
> legacyGenerationStamp/generationStamp
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HDFS-9677
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9677
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: namenode
> Reporter: Jing Zhao
> Assignee: Mingliang Liu
> Fix For: 2.9.0
>
> Attachments: HDFS-9677-branch-2.000.patch, HDFS-9677.000.patch,
> HDFS-9677.001.patch
>
>
> [comment|https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9542?focusedCommentId=15110531&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-15110531]
> from [~drankye] in HDFS-9542:
> {quote}
> Just wonder if it's a good idea to rename: generationStampV1 =>
> legacyGenerationStamp; generationStampV2 => generationStamp, similar for
> other variables, as we have legacy block and block.
> {quote}
> This jira plans to do this rename.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
