[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9198?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15174214#comment-15174214
 ] 

Kihwal Lee commented on HDFS-9198:
----------------------------------

Relevant tests are all passing with this patch.
{noformat}
-------------------------------------------------------
 T E S T S
-------------------------------------------------------
OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM warning: ignoring option MaxPermSize=768m; support was 
removed in 8.0
Running org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.TestIncrementalBrVariations
Tests run: 4, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 18.301 sec - in 
org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.TestIncrementalBrVariations
OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM warning: ignoring option MaxPermSize=768m; support was 
removed in 8.0
Running org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.TestDeadDatanode
Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 18.83 sec - in 
org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.TestDeadDatanode
OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM warning: ignoring option MaxPermSize=768m; support was 
removed in 8.0
Running org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.blockmanagement.TestBlockManager
Tests run: 17, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 27.238 sec - 
in org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.blockmanagement.TestBlockManager
OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM warning: ignoring option MaxPermSize=768m; support was 
removed in 8.0
Running org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.blockmanagement.TestPendingReplication
Tests run: 4, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 33.094 sec - in 
org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.blockmanagement.TestPendingReplication
OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM warning: ignoring option MaxPermSize=768m; support was 
removed in 8.0
Running org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.TestDatanodeRegistration
Tests run: 6, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 18.187 sec - in 
org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.TestDatanodeRegistration

Results :

Tests run: 32, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0
{noformat}

Just committed to branch-2.7. Thanks, Vinay!

> Coalesce IBR processing in the NN
> ---------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-9198
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9198
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: namenode
>    Affects Versions: 2.0.0-alpha
>            Reporter: Daryn Sharp
>            Assignee: Daryn Sharp
>             Fix For: 2.8.0, 2.7.3
>
>         Attachments: HDFS-9198-Branch-2-withamend.diff, 
> HDFS-9198-Branch-2.8-withamend.diff, HDFS-9198-branch-2.7.patch, 
> HDFS-9198-branch2.patch, HDFS-9198-trunk.patch, HDFS-9198-trunk.patch, 
> HDFS-9198-trunk.patch, HDFS-9198-trunk.patch, HDFS-9198-trunk.patch
>
>
> IBRs from thousands of DNs under load will degrade NN performance due to 
> excessive write-lock contention from multiple IPC handler threads.  The IBR 
> processing is quick, so the lock contention may be reduced by coalescing 
> multiple IBRs into a single write-lock transaction.  The handlers will also 
> be freed up faster for other operations.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to