[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1742?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13006148#comment-13006148
 ] 

dhruba borthakur commented on HDFS-1742:
----------------------------------------

I agree that this is a useful feature, we have many processes that watch the 
filesystem namespace and does various things when files/directories appears in 
the HDFS namespace. However, making the fsedit logging invoke user-specified 
callbacks seems problematic. What happens when the callback does not return 
within a specific period of time? What locks can the namenode keep across these 
callsbacks? who will retry-callbacks if the callback returned "failure"? 

I would rather vote that the HDFS namenode log all these changes into a file in 
a well-defined-format (aka HDFS-1179). This is the core building block that is 
needed by an external application to build notifications mechanism, or 
publish-subscribe software, etc.etc.


> Provide hooks / callbacks to execute some code based on events happening in 
> HDFS (file / directory creation, opening, closing, etc)
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-1742
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1742
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: name-node
>            Reporter: Mikhail Yakshin
>              Labels: features, polling
>
> We're working on a system that runs various Hadoop job continuously, based on 
> the data that appears in HDFS: for example, we have a job that works on day's 
> worth of data and creates output in {{/output/YYYY/MM/DD}}. For input, it 
> should wait for directory with externally uploaded data as 
> {{/input/YYYY/MM/DD}} to appear, and also wait for previous day's data to 
> appear, i.e. {{/output/YYYY/MM/DD-1}}.
> Obviously, one of the possible solutions is polling once in a while for 
> files/directories we're waiting for, but generally it's a bad solution. The 
> better one is something like file alteration monitor or [inode activity 
> notifiers|http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inotify], such as ones implemented in 
> Linux filesystems.
> Basic idea is that one can specify (inject) some code that will be executed 
> on every major event happening in HDFS, such as:
> * File created / open
> * File closed
> * File deleted
> * Directory created
> * Directory deleted
> I see simplistic implementation as following: NN defines some interfaces that 
> implement callback/hook mechanism - i.e. something like:
> {code}
> interface NameNodeCallback {
>     public void onFileCreate(SomeFileInformation f);
>     public void onFileClose(SomeFileInformation f);
>     public void onFileDelete(SomeFileInformation f);
>     ...
> }
> {code}
> It might be possible to creates a class that implements this method and load 
> it somehow (for example, using an extra jar in classpath) in NameNode's JVM. 
> NameNode includes a configuration option that specifies names of such 
> class(es) - then NameNode instantiates them and calls methods from them (in a 
> separate thread) on every valid event happening.
> There would be a couple of ready-made pluggable implementations of such a 
> class that would be most likely distributed as contrib. Default NameNode's 
> process would stay the same without any visible differences.
> Hadoop's JobTracker already extensively uses the same paradigm with pluggable 
> Scheduler interfaces, such as [Fair 
> Scheduler|https://github.com/apache/hadoop/tree/trunk/src/contrib/fairscheduler],
>  [Capacity 
> Scheduler|https://github.com/apache/hadoop/tree/trunk/src/contrib/capacity-scheduler],
>  [Dynamic 
> Scheduler|https://github.com/apache/hadoop/tree/trunk/src/contrib/dynamic-scheduler],
>  etc. It also uses a class(es) that loads and runs inside JobTracker's 
> context, few relatively trustued varieties exist, they're distributed as 
> contrib and purely optional to be enabled by cluster admin.
> This would allow systems such as I've described in the beginning to be 
> implemented without polling.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to