[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1751?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13008188#comment-13008188
]
Daryn Sharp commented on HDFS-1751:
-----------------------------------
Yes, the comment is regarding the "reuse" of the checkQuota flag. The lines
that immediately follow are:
+ if (checkQuota) {
+ verifyFsLimits(pathComponents, pos, child);
+ }
> Intrinsic limits for HDFS files, directories
> --------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HDFS-1751
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1751
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: data-node
> Affects Versions: 0.22.0
> Reporter: Daryn Sharp
> Assignee: Daryn Sharp
> Fix For: 0.23.0
>
> Attachments: HDFS-1751-2.patch, HDFS-1751-3.patch, HDFS-1751-4.patch,
> HDFS-1751.patch
>
>
> Enforce a configurable limit on:
> the length of a path component
> the number of names in a directory
> The intention is to prevent a too-long name or a too-full directory. This is
> not about RPC buffers, the length of command lines, etc. There may be good
> reasons for those kinds of limits, but that is not the intended scope of this
> feature. Consequently, a reasonable implementation might be to extend the
> existing quota checker so that it faults the creation of a name that violates
> the limits. This strategy of faulting new creation evades the problem of
> existing names or directories that violate the limits.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
