[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10495?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15324923#comment-15324923
]
Rushabh S Shah commented on HDFS-10495:
---------------------------------------
According to this [comment |
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8872?focusedCommentId=15317548&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-15317548]
by [~mingma], it seems like an incompatible change. We may have to put it
only in trunk.
> Block should be marked as missing if the all the replicas are on
> Decommissioned nodes.
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HDFS-10495
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10495
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: namenode
> Affects Versions: 2.8.0
> Reporter: Rushabh S Shah
> Assignee: Rushabh S Shah
>
> As discussed on HDFS-8872, we should mark a block as missing if all the
> replicas on decommissioned nodes since we can take the decommissioned nodes
> out of rotation anytime.
> We have seen multiple cases where all the replicas land on decommissioned
> nodes.
> After HDFS-7933, it doesn't mark as missing.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
