[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10490?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

He Tianyi updated HDFS-10490:
-----------------------------
    Attachment: HDFS-10490.0001.patch

Added test.

> Client may never recovery replica after a timeout during sending packet
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-10490
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10490
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: datanode
>    Affects Versions: 2.6.0
>            Reporter: He Tianyi
>         Attachments: HDFS-10490.0001.patch, HDFS-10490.patch
>
>
> For newly created replica, a meta file is created in constructor of 
> {{BlockReceiver}} (for {{WRITE_BLOCK}} op). Its header will be written lazily 
> (buffered in memory first by {{BufferedOutputStream}}). 
> If following packets fail to deliver (e.g. in  extreme network condition), 
> the header may never get flush until closed. 
> However, {{BlockReceiver}} will not call close until block receiving is 
> finished or exception(s) encountered. Also in extreme network condition, both 
> RST & FIN may not deliver in time. 
> In this case, if client tries to initiates a {{transferBlock}} to a new 
> datanode (in {{addDatanode2ExistingPipeline}}), existing datanode will see an 
> empty meta if its {{BlockReceiver}} did not close in time. 
> Then, after HDFS-3429, a default {{DataChecksum}} (NULL, 512) will be used 
> during transfer. So when client then tries to recover pipeline after 
> completely transferred, it may encounter the following exception:
> {noformat}
> java.io.IOException: Client requested checksum DataChecksum(type=CRC32C, 
> chunkSize=4096) when appending to an existing block with different chunk 
> size: DataChecksum(type=NULL, chunkSize=512)
>         at 
> org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.ReplicaInPipeline.createStreams(ReplicaInPipeline.java:230)
>         at 
> org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.BlockReceiver.<init>(BlockReceiver.java:226)
>         at 
> org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataXceiver.writeBlock(DataXceiver.java:798)
>         at 
> org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.protocol.datatransfer.Receiver.opWriteBlock(Receiver.java:166)
>         at 
> org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.protocol.datatransfer.Receiver.processOp(Receiver.java:76)
>         at 
> org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataXceiver.run(DataXceiver.java:243)
>         at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
> {noformat}
> This will repeat, until exhausted by datanode replacement policy.
> Also to note that, with bad luck (like I), 20k clients are all doing this. 
> It's to some extend a DDoS attack to NameNode (because of 
> getAdditionalDataNode calls).
> I suggest we flush immediately after header is written, preventing anybody 
> from seeing empty meta file for avoiding the issue.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org

Reply via email to