[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8046?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15329542#comment-15329542
 ] 

Kihwal Lee commented on HDFS-8046:
----------------------------------

[~xiaochen], thanks for letting me know. I've cherry-picked the fix to 2.6 and 
2.7.

> Allow better control of getContentSummary
> -----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-8046
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8046
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Kihwal Lee
>            Assignee: Kihwal Lee
>              Labels: 2.6.1-candidate, 2.7.2-candidate
>             Fix For: 2.6.1, 2.7.2
>
>         Attachments: HDFS-8046-branch-2.6.1.txt, HDFS-8046.v1.patch
>
>
> On busy clusters, users performing quota checks against a big directory 
> structure can affect the namenode performance. It has become a lot better 
> after HDFS-4995, but as clusters get bigger and busier, it is apparent that 
> we need finer grain control to avoid long read lock causing throughput drop.
> Even with unfair namesystem lock setting, a long read lock (10s of 
> milliseconds) can starve many readers and especially writers. So the locking 
> duration should be reduced, which can be done by imposing a lower 
> count-per-iteration limit in the existing implementation.  But HDFS-4995 came 
> with a fixed amount of sleep between locks. This needs to be made 
> configurable, so that {{getContentSummary()}} doesn't get exceedingly slow.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org

Reply via email to