[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8046?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15329542#comment-15329542 ]
Kihwal Lee commented on HDFS-8046: ---------------------------------- [~xiaochen], thanks for letting me know. I've cherry-picked the fix to 2.6 and 2.7. > Allow better control of getContentSummary > ----------------------------------------- > > Key: HDFS-8046 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8046 > Project: Hadoop HDFS > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Kihwal Lee > Assignee: Kihwal Lee > Labels: 2.6.1-candidate, 2.7.2-candidate > Fix For: 2.6.1, 2.7.2 > > Attachments: HDFS-8046-branch-2.6.1.txt, HDFS-8046.v1.patch > > > On busy clusters, users performing quota checks against a big directory > structure can affect the namenode performance. It has become a lot better > after HDFS-4995, but as clusters get bigger and busier, it is apparent that > we need finer grain control to avoid long read lock causing throughput drop. > Even with unfair namesystem lock setting, a long read lock (10s of > milliseconds) can starve many readers and especially writers. So the locking > duration should be reduced, which can be done by imposing a lower > count-per-iteration limit in the existing implementation. But HDFS-4995 came > with a fixed amount of sleep between locks. This needs to be made > configurable, so that {{getContentSummary()}} doesn't get exceedingly slow. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org