[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9924?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15336830#comment-15336830
]
Xiaobing Zhou commented on HDFS-9924:
-------------------------------------
Hi [~stack]
bq. It looks like the difference between 'async' and thread pool is negligible;
10% at the extreme. Is that how you interpret the results?
Yes.
bq. As per Andrew Wang, would be interested in what happens when less threads
(especially as NN is set up with 300 handlers...); tendency seems to be the
less threads you use, the better it does.
I will probably run benchmark for cases of less threads, but the tendency may
not be true. Thank you.
> [umbrella] Nonblocking HDFS Access
> ----------------------------------
>
> Key: HDFS-9924
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9924
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: fs
> Reporter: Tsz Wo Nicholas Sze
> Assignee: Xiaobing Zhou
> Attachments: Async-HDFS-Performance-Report.pdf, AsyncHdfs20160510.pdf
>
>
> This is an umbrella JIRA for supporting Nonblocking HDFS Access.
> Currently, all the API methods are blocking calls -- the caller is blocked
> until the method returns. It is very slow if a client makes a large number
> of independent calls in a single thread since each call has to wait until the
> previous call is finished. It is inefficient if a client needs to create a
> large number of threads to invoke the calls.
> We propose adding a new API to support nonblocking calls, i.e. the caller is
> not blocked. The methods in the new API immediately return a Java Future
> object. The return value can be obtained by the usual Future.get() method.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
