[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10757?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Sergey Shelukhin updated HDFS-10757:
------------------------------------
    Description: 
ClientContext::get gets the context from CACHE via a config setting based name, 
then KeyProviderCache stored in ClientContext gets the key provider cached by 
URI from the configuration, too. These would return the same KeyProvider 
regardless of current UGI.
KMSClientProvider caches the UGI (actualUgi) in ctor; that means in particular 
that all the users of DFS with KMSClientProvider in a process will get the KMS 
token (along with other credentials) of the first user, via the above cache.

Either KMSClientProvider shouldn't store the UGI, or one of the caches should 
be UGI-aware, like the FS object cache.

Side note: the comment in createConnection that purports to handle the 
different UGI doesn't seem to cover what it says it covers. In our case, we 
have two unrelated UGIs with no auth (createRemoteUser) with bunch of tokens, 
including a KMS token, added.

  was:
ClientContext::get gets the context from CACHE via a config setting based name, 
then KeyProviderCache stored in ClientContext gets the key provider cached by 
URI from the configuration, too. These would return the same KeyProvider 
regardless of current UGI.
KMSClientProvider caches the UGI (actualUgi) in ctor; that means in particular 
that all the users of DFS with KMSClientProvider in a process will get the KMS 
token (along with other credentials) of the first user, via the above cache.

Either KMSClientProvider shouldn't store the UGI, or one of the caches should 
be UGI-aware, like the FS object cache.

Side note: the comment in createConnection that purports to handle the 
different UGI doesn't seem to cover it says it covers. In our case, we have two 
unrelated UGIs with no auth (createRemoteUser) with bunch of tokens, including 
a KMS token, added.


> KMSClientProvider combined with KeyProviderCache results in wrong UGI being 
> used
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-10757
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10757
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Sergey Shelukhin
>            Priority: Critical
>
> ClientContext::get gets the context from CACHE via a config setting based 
> name, then KeyProviderCache stored in ClientContext gets the key provider 
> cached by URI from the configuration, too. These would return the same 
> KeyProvider regardless of current UGI.
> KMSClientProvider caches the UGI (actualUgi) in ctor; that means in 
> particular that all the users of DFS with KMSClientProvider in a process will 
> get the KMS token (along with other credentials) of the first user, via the 
> above cache.
> Either KMSClientProvider shouldn't store the UGI, or one of the caches should 
> be UGI-aware, like the FS object cache.
> Side note: the comment in createConnection that purports to handle the 
> different UGI doesn't seem to cover what it says it covers. In our case, we 
> have two unrelated UGIs with no auth (createRemoteUser) with bunch of tokens, 
> including a KMS token, added.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org

Reply via email to