[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10763?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15425542#comment-15425542
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-10763:
----------------------------------

| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue}  0m 
21s{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green}  0m  
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} test4tests {color} | {color:red}  0m  
0s{color} | {color:red} The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified 
tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please 
list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green}  6m 
 4s{color} | {color:green} branch-2.7 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green}  1m  
8s{color} | {color:green} branch-2.7 passed with JDK v1.8.0_101 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green}  1m 
11s{color} | {color:green} branch-2.7 passed with JDK v1.7.0_101 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green}  0m 
26s{color} | {color:green} branch-2.7 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green}  1m  
4s{color} | {color:green} branch-2.7 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvneclipse {color} | {color:green}  0m 
15s{color} | {color:green} branch-2.7 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green}  2m 
58s{color} | {color:green} branch-2.7 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green}  0m 
59s{color} | {color:green} branch-2.7 passed with JDK v1.8.0_101 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green}  1m 
40s{color} | {color:green} branch-2.7 passed with JDK v1.7.0_101 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green}  0m 
51s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green}  0m 
57s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.8.0_101 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green}  0m 
57s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green}  0m 
59s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.7.0_101 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green}  0m 
59s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green}  0m 
21s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green}  0m 
56s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvneclipse {color} | {color:green}  0m 
12s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} whitespace {color} | {color:red}  0m  
1s{color} | {color:red} The patch has 1578 line(s) that end in whitespace. Use 
git apply --whitespace=fix <<patch_file>>. Refer 
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-apply {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} whitespace {color} | {color:red}  0m 
42s{color} | {color:red} The patch 78 line(s) with tabs. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green}  3m 
13s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green}  0m 
58s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.8.0_101 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green}  1m 
41s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.7.0_101 {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} unit {color} | {color:red} 63m 40s{color} 
| {color:red} hadoop-hdfs in the patch failed with JDK v1.7.0_101. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} asflicense {color} | {color:red}  0m 
24s{color} | {color:red} The patch generated 3 ASF License warnings. {color} |
| {color:black}{color} | {color:black} {color} | {color:black}155m  3s{color} | 
{color:black} {color} |
\\
\\
|| Reason || Tests ||
| JDK v1.8.0_101 Failed junit tests | 
hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.snapshot.TestRenameWithSnapshots |
|   | hadoop.hdfs.server.blockmanagement.TestBlockManager |
|   | hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.TestDataNodeVolumeFailure |
|   | hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.TestBlockReplacement |
|   | hadoop.hdfs.server.balancer.TestBalancerWithMultipleNameNodes |
|   | hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.TestFileTruncate |
| JDK v1.7.0_101 Failed junit tests | 
hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.snapshot.TestRenameWithSnapshots |
|   | hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.TestDataNodeVolumeFailure |
|   | hadoop.hdfs.server.balancer.TestBalancer |
|   | hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.TestBlockReplacement |
|   | hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.TestFileTruncate |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| Docker |  Image:yetus/hadoop:c420dfe |
| JIRA Patch URL | 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12824195/HDFS-10763.branch-2.7.supplement.patch
 |
| JIRA Issue | HDFS-10763 |
| Optional Tests |  asflicense  compile  javac  javadoc  mvninstall  mvnsite  
unit  findbugs  checkstyle  |
| uname | Linux fccfd73e7905 3.13.0-36-lowlatency #63-Ubuntu SMP PREEMPT Wed 
Sep 3 21:56:12 UTC 2014 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux |
| Build tool | maven |
| Personality | /testptch/hadoop/patchprocess/precommit/personality/provided.sh 
|
| git revision | branch-2.7 / 040a1b7 |
| Default Java | 1.7.0_101 |
| Multi-JDK versions |  /usr/lib/jvm/java-8-oracle:1.8.0_101 
/usr/lib/jvm/java-7-openjdk-amd64:1.7.0_101 |
| findbugs | v3.0.0 |
| whitespace | 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/16454/artifact/patchprocess/whitespace-eol.txt
 |
| whitespace | 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/16454/artifact/patchprocess/whitespace-tabs.txt
 |
| unit | 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/16454/artifact/patchprocess/patch-unit-hadoop-hdfs-project_hadoop-hdfs-jdk1.7.0_101.txt
 |
| JDK v1.7.0_101  Test Results | 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/16454/testReport/ |
| asflicense | 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/16454/artifact/patchprocess/patch-asflicense-problems.txt
 |
| modules | C: hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs U: 
hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs |
| Console output | 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/16454/console |
| Powered by | Apache Yetus 0.4.0-SNAPSHOT   http://yetus.apache.org |


This message was automatically generated.



> Open files can leak permanently due to inconsistent lease update
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-10763
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10763
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 2.7.3, 2.6.4
>            Reporter: Kihwal Lee
>            Assignee: Kihwal Lee
>            Priority: Critical
>             Fix For: 2.7.4, 3.0.0-alpha2
>
>         Attachments: HDFS-10763.br27.patch, 
> HDFS-10763.branch-2.7.supplement.patch, HDFS-10763.patch
>
>
> This can heppen during {{commitBlockSynchronization()}} or a client gives up 
> on closing a file after retries.
> From {{finalizeINodeFileUnderConstruction()}}, the lease is removed first and 
> then the inode is turned into the closed state. But if any block is not in 
> COMPLETE state, 
> {{INodeFile#assertAllBlocksComplete()}} will throw an exception. This will 
> cause the lease is removed from the lease manager, but not from the inode. 
> Since the lease manager does not have a lease for the file, no lease recovery 
> will happen for this file. Moreover, this broken state is persisted and 
> reconstructed through saving and loading of fsimage. Since no replication is 
> scheduled for the blocks for the file, this can cause a data loss and also 
> block decommissioning of datanode.
> The lease cannot be manually recovered either. It fails with
> {noformat}
> ...AlreadyBeingCreatedException): Failed to RECOVER_LEASE /xyz/xyz for user1 
> on
>  0.0.0.1 because the file is under construction but no leases found.
>       at 
> org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSNamesystem.recoverLeaseInternal(FSNamesystem.java:2950)
> ...
> {noformat}
> When a client retries {{close()}}, the same inconsistent state is created, 
> but it can work in the next time since {{checkLease()}} only looks at the 
> inode, not the lease manager in this case. The close behavior is different if 
> HDFS-8999 is activated by setting 
> {{dfs.namenode.file.close.num-committed-allowed}} to 1 (unlikely) or 2 
> (never). 
> In principle, the under-construction feature of an inode and the lease in the 
> lease manager should never go out of sync. The fix involves two parts.
> 1) Prevent inconsistent lease updates. We can achieve this by calling 
> {{removeLease()}} after checking the block state. 
> 2) Avoid reconstructing inconsistent lease states from a fsimage. 1) alone 
> does not correct the existing inconsistencies surviving through fsimages.  
> This can be done during fsimage loading time by making sure a corresponding 
> lease exists for each inode that are with the underconstruction feature. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org

Reply via email to