[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10999?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15568227#comment-15568227
]
Rakesh R commented on HDFS-10999:
---------------------------------
Thanks [~jojochuang] for bringing this point. I remember there was a
[discussion|https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-7955?focusedCommentId=15159765&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-15159765]
about renaming the replication related metrics. It was not done considering
that the upper layer applications quite heavily used these metrics and could be
risky.
> Use more generic "low redundancy" blocks instead of "under replicated" blocks
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HDFS-10999
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10999
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: erasure-coding
> Affects Versions: 3.0.0-alpha1
> Reporter: Wei-Chiu Chuang
> Assignee: Yuanbo Liu
> Labels: supportability
>
> Per HDFS-9857, it seems in the Hadoop 3 world, people prefer the more generic
> term "low redundancy" to the old-fashioned "under replicated". But this term
> is still being used in messages in several places, such as web ui, dfsadmin
> and fsck. We should probably change them to avoid confusion.
> File this jira to discuss it.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
