[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-11088?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15631159#comment-15631159
 ] 

Andrew Wang commented on HDFS-11088:
------------------------------------

This looks okay, since {{checkSafeMode}} behaves very similarly. It's a bit 
concerning though that we don't check the return value; I think 
{{numberOfBytesInFutureBlocks}} will always be zero here since no block reports 
have been received so {{force}} doesn't apply, but maybe we should add a 
Precondition check on the return value for safety.

[~liuml07] / [~jingzhao] care to comment as the local safemode experts?

> Quash unnecessary safemode WARN message during NameNode startup
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-11088
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-11088
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>    Affects Versions: 3.0.0-alpha1
>            Reporter: Andrew Wang
>            Assignee: Yiqun Lin
>            Priority: Trivial
>              Labels: newbie
>         Attachments: HDFS-11088.001.patch
>
>
> I tried starting a NameNode on a freshly formatted cluster, and it produced 
> this WARN log:
> {noformat}
> 16/11/01 16:42:44 WARN blockmanagement.BlockManagerSafeMode: forceExit used 
> when normal exist would suffice. Treating force exit as normal safe mode exit.
> {noformat}
> I didn't do any special commands related to safemode, so this log should be 
> quashed.
> I didn't try the branch-2's, but it's likely this issue exists there as well.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org

Reply via email to