[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-11160?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15749708#comment-15749708
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-11160:
----------------------------------

| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue}  0m  
0s{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} patch {color} | {color:red}  0m  8s{color} 
| {color:red} HDFS-11160 does not apply to trunk. Rebase required? Wrong 
Branch? See https://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/HowToContribute for help. {color} |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| JIRA Issue | HDFS-11160 |
| JIRA Patch URL | 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12843304/HDFS-11160.007.patch |
| Console output | 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/17859/console |
| Powered by | Apache Yetus 0.5.0-SNAPSHOT   http://yetus.apache.org |


This message was automatically generated.



> VolumeScanner reports write-in-progress replicas as corrupt incorrectly
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-11160
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-11160
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: datanode
>         Environment: CDH5.7.4
>            Reporter: Wei-Chiu Chuang
>            Assignee: Wei-Chiu Chuang
>         Attachments: HDFS-11160.001.patch, HDFS-11160.002.patch, 
> HDFS-11160.003.patch, HDFS-11160.004.patch, HDFS-11160.005.patch, 
> HDFS-11160.006.patch, HDFS-11160.007.patch, HDFS-11160.reproduce.patch
>
>
> Due to a race condition initially reported in HDFS-6804, VolumeScanner may 
> erroneously detect good replicas as corrupt. This is serious because in some 
> cases it results in data loss if all replicas are declared corrupt. This bug 
> is especially prominent when there are a lot of append requests via 
> HttpFs/WebHDFS.
> We are investigating an incidence that caused very high block corruption rate 
> in a relatively small cluster. Initially, we thought HDFS-11056 is to blame. 
> However, after applying HDFS-11056, we are still seeing VolumeScanner 
> reporting corrupt replicas.
> It turns out that if a replica is being appended while VolumeScanner is 
> scanning it, VolumeScanner may use the new checksum to compare against old 
> data, causing checksum mismatch.
> I have a unit test to reproduce the error. Will attach later. A quick and 
> simple fix is to hold FsDatasetImpl lock and read from disk the checksum.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org

Reply via email to