[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-11431?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15926983#comment-15926983
 ] 

Allen Wittenauer commented on HDFS-11431:
-----------------------------------------

bq. Could we get away with declaring hadoop-hdfs as a dependency of 
hadoop-client, but excluding the transitive dependencies which aren't needed? 

IMO, I think that sort of defeats the purpose.

bq. On that topic, Allen, could we have yetus do a before/after diff on 
dependencies on any patch which touches a POM? That we can always see what the 
transitive effects of a dependency change are.

Patches accepted. ;)

> hadoop-hdfs-client JAR does not include ConfiguredFailoverProxyProvider
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-11431
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-11431
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: build, hdfs-client
>    Affects Versions: 2.8.0, 3.0.0-alpha3
>            Reporter: Steven Rand
>            Priority: Blocker
>              Labels: maven
>         Attachments: HDFS-11431-branch-2.8.0.001.patch, 
> HDFS-11431-branch-2.8.0.002.patch
>
>
> The {{hadoop-hdfs-client-2.8.0.jar}} file does include the 
> {{ConfiguredFailoverProxyProvider}} class. This breaks client applications 
> that use this class to communicate with the active NameNode in an HA 
> deployment of HDFS.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org

Reply via email to