[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-11334?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15953959#comment-15953959
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-11334:
----------------------------------

| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue}  0m 
22s{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green}  0m  
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} test4tests {color} | {color:green}  0m 
 0s{color} | {color:green} The patch appears to include 2 new or modified test 
files. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 15m 
54s{color} | {color:green} HDFS-10285 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green}  0m 
42s{color} | {color:green} HDFS-10285 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green}  0m 
47s{color} | {color:green} HDFS-10285 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green}  0m 
48s{color} | {color:green} HDFS-10285 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvneclipse {color} | {color:green}  0m 
15s{color} | {color:green} HDFS-10285 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green}  1m 
40s{color} | {color:green} HDFS-10285 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green}  0m 
38s{color} | {color:green} HDFS-10285 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green}  0m 
39s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green}  0m 
37s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} cc {color} | {color:green}  0m 
37s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green}  0m 
37s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:orange}-0{color} | {color:orange} checkstyle {color} | {color:orange}  
0m 31s{color} | {color:orange} hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs: The patch 
generated 8 new + 505 unchanged - 1 fixed = 513 total (was 506) {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green}  0m 
43s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvneclipse {color} | {color:green}  0m 
 8s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} whitespace {color} | {color:red}  0m  
0s{color} | {color:red} The patch has 1 line(s) that end in whitespace. Use git 
apply --whitespace=fix <<patch_file>>. Refer https://git-scm.com/docs/git-apply 
{color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} findbugs {color} | {color:red}  1m 
42s{color} | {color:red} hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs generated 1 new + 0 
unchanged - 0 fixed = 1 total (was 0) {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green}  0m 
33s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} unit {color} | {color:red}122m 19s{color} 
| {color:red} hadoop-hdfs in the patch failed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} asflicense {color} | {color:green}  0m 
25s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not generate ASF License warnings. 
{color} |
| {color:black}{color} | {color:black} {color} | {color:black}149m 55s{color} | 
{color:black} {color} |
\\
\\
|| Reason || Tests ||
| FindBugs | module:hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs |
|  |  new 
org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.StoragePolicySatisfyWorker(Configuration,
 DataNode) invokes org.apache.hadoop.util.Daemon.start()  At 
StoragePolicySatisfyWorker.java: At StoragePolicySatisfyWorker.java:[line 113] |
| Failed junit tests | hadoop.hdfs.TestDFSStripedOutputStreamWithFailure160 |
|   | hadoop.hdfs.TestDFSStripedOutputStreamWithFailure200 |
|   | hadoop.hdfs.TestDFSStripedOutputStreamWithFailure030 |
|   | hadoop.hdfs.TestDFSStripedOutputStreamWithFailure070 |
|   | hadoop.hdfs.web.TestWebHdfsTimeouts |
|   | hadoop.hdfs.TestDFSStripedOutputStreamWithFailure120 |
|   | hadoop.hdfs.TestDFSStripedOutputStreamWithFailure130 |
|   | hadoop.hdfs.TestDFSStripedOutputStreamWithFailure090 |
|   | hadoop.hdfs.TestDFSStripedOutputStreamWithFailure050 |
|   | hadoop.hdfs.TestDFSStripedOutputStreamWithFailure040 |
|   | hadoop.hdfs.TestDFSStripedOutputStreamWithFailure010 |
|   | hadoop.hdfs.TestSafeMode |
|   | hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.ha.TestSeveralNameNodes |
|   | hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.TestFSImage |
|   | hadoop.hdfs.TestDFSStripedOutputStreamWithFailure060 |
|   | hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.TestDataNodeUUID |
|   | hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.snapshot.TestRenameWithSnapshots |
|   | hadoop.hdfs.TestDFSStripedOutputStreamWithFailure210 |
|   | hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.TestPersistentStoragePolicySatisfier |
|   | hadoop.hdfs.TestDFSRSDefault10x4StripedOutputStreamWithFailure |
|   | hadoop.hdfs.shortcircuit.TestShortCircuitLocalRead |
|   | hadoop.hdfs.TestDFSStripedOutputStreamWithFailure170 |
|   | hadoop.hdfs.TestDFSStripedOutputStreamWithFailure190 |
|   | hadoop.hdfs.TestDFSStripedOutputStreamWithFailure110 |
|   | hadoop.hdfs.TestDFSStripedOutputStreamWithFailure000 |
|   | hadoop.hdfs.TestDFSRSDefault10x4StripedOutputStream |
|   | hadoop.fs.TestSymlinkHdfsFileContext |
|   | hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.ha.TestHAStateTransitions |
|   | hadoop.hdfs.TestDFSStripedOutputStreamWithFailure150 |
|   | hadoop.hdfs.TestFileChecksum |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| Docker |  Image:yetus/hadoop:a9ad5d6 |
| JIRA Issue | HDFS-11334 |
| JIRA Patch URL | 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12861730/HDFS-11334-HDFS-10285-01.patch
 |
| Optional Tests |  asflicense  compile  javac  javadoc  mvninstall  mvnsite  
unit  findbugs  checkstyle  cc  |
| uname | Linux a659c6f9e094 4.4.0-43-generic #63-Ubuntu SMP Wed Oct 12 
13:48:03 UTC 2016 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux |
| Build tool | maven |
| Personality | /testptch/hadoop/patchprocess/precommit/personality/provided.sh 
|
| git revision | HDFS-10285 / ff9ccfe |
| Default Java | 1.8.0_121 |
| findbugs | v3.0.0 |
| checkstyle | 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/18955/artifact/patchprocess/diff-checkstyle-hadoop-hdfs-project_hadoop-hdfs.txt
 |
| whitespace | 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/18955/artifact/patchprocess/whitespace-eol.txt
 |
| findbugs | 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/18955/artifact/patchprocess/new-findbugs-hadoop-hdfs-project_hadoop-hdfs.html
 |
| unit | 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/18955/artifact/patchprocess/patch-unit-hadoop-hdfs-project_hadoop-hdfs.txt
 |
|  Test Results | 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/18955/testReport/ |
| modules | C: hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs U: 
hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs |
| Console output | 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/18955/console |
| Powered by | Apache Yetus 0.5.0-SNAPSHOT   http://yetus.apache.org |


This message was automatically generated.



> [SPS]: NN switch and rescheduling movements can lead to have more than one 
> coordinator for same file blocks
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-11334
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-11334
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: datanode, namenode
>    Affects Versions: HDFS-10285
>            Reporter: Uma Maheswara Rao G
>            Assignee: Rakesh R
>             Fix For: HDFS-10285
>
>         Attachments: HDFS-11334-HDFS-10285-00.patch, 
> HDFS-11334-HDFS-10285-01.patch
>
>
> I am summarizing the scenarios here what Rakesh and me discussed offline:
> Here we need to handle couple of cases:
> # NN switch - it will freshly start scheduling for all files.
>        At this time, old co-ordinators may continue movement work and send 
> results back. This could confuse NN SPS that which result is right one.
>   *NEED TO HANDLE*
> # DN disconnected for heartbeat expiry - If DN disconnected for long 
> time(more than heartbeat expiry), NN will remove this nodes. After SPS 
> Monitor time out, it may retry for files which were scheduled to that DN, by 
> finding new co-ordinator. But if it reconnects back after NN reschedules, it 
> may lead to get different results from deferent co-ordinators.
> *NEED TO HANDLE*
> # NN Restart- Should be same as point 1
> # DN disconnect - here When DN disconnected simply and reconnected 
> immediately (before heartbeat expiry), there should not any issues
> *NEED NOT HANDLE*, but can think of more scenarios if any thing missing
> # DN Restart- If DN restarted, DN can not send any results as it will loose 
> everything. After NN SPS Monitor timeout, it will retry.
> *NEED NOT HANDLE*, but can think of more scenarios if any thing missing



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org

Reply via email to