[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10999?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15961428#comment-15961428
 ] 

Wei-Chiu Chuang commented on HDFS-10999:
----------------------------------------

Thanks [~manojg] this is a pretty big patch and I am taking the time to review.
bq. PS: DfsAdmin -report and WebUI are not updated to make use of the newer 
infrastructure. Probably after we finalize on this infra, I can take up the 
consumers separately in a new jira.
HDFS-8196 is filed for displaying EC information. We can either extend that, or 
file a new jira explicitly for the metrics added in this one.
We will need a new jira for DFSAdmin for sure.

Thanks.

> Introduce separate stats for Replicated and Erasure Coded Blocks apart from 
> the current Aggregated stats
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-10999
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10999
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: erasure-coding
>    Affects Versions: 3.0.0-alpha1
>            Reporter: Wei-Chiu Chuang
>            Assignee: Manoj Govindassamy
>              Labels: hdfs-ec-3.0-nice-to-have, supportability
>         Attachments: HDFS-10999.01.patch
>
>
> Per HDFS-9857, it seems in the Hadoop 3 world, people prefer the more generic 
> term "low redundancy" to the old-fashioned "under replicated". But this term 
> is still being used in messages in several places, such as web ui, dfsadmin 
> and fsck. We should probably change them to avoid confusion.
> File this jira to discuss it.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org

Reply via email to