[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-11742?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16045628#comment-16045628 ]
Konstantin Shvachko commented on HDFS-11742: -------------------------------------------- Hi [~kihwal], thanks for the data. Shows your point well. I have a 2600-node cluster, where we've been running Balancer pretty actively. This was initially based on 2.6, but now pretty close to branch-2.7, and with HDFS-8818 applied. Here is the graph, thanks [~xkrogen] for generating it: !https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12872444/replaceBlockNumOps-8w.jpg! The maximum number of transfers is 50 - close to yours. We do not allow the Balancer to run "full speed" to allow room for normal workload on the cluster. So I am not completely sure that HDFS-8818 is the only thing to blame for the slowness you described. I did not run branch-2.8 Balancer, but I plan to test on branch-2.7 in the very near future. Also looked at your patch. Sounds like a reasonable change to me. But may be we want to understand more closely at the root cause of the behavior before we commit? > Improve balancer usability after HDFS-8818 > ------------------------------------------ > > Key: HDFS-11742 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-11742 > Project: Hadoop HDFS > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Kihwal Lee > Assignee: Kihwal Lee > Priority: Blocker > Labels: release-blocker > Attachments: balancer2.8.png, balancer_fix.png, > HDFS-11742.branch-2.8.patch, HDFS-11742.branch-2.patch, > HDFS-11742.trunk.patch, HDFS-11742.v2.trunk.patch, replaceBlockNumOps-8w.jpg, > replaceBlockNumOps-8w.png > > > We ran 2.8 balancer with HDFS-8818 on a 280-node and a 2,400-node cluster. In > both cases, it would hang forever after two iterations. The two iterations > were also moving things at a significantly lower rate. The hang itself is > fixed by HDFS-11377, but the design limitation remains, so the balancer > throughput ends up actually lower. > Instead of reverting HDFS-8188 as originally suggested, I am making a small > change to make it less error prone and more usable. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.15#6346) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org