[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-13035?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16337089#comment-16337089 ]
Xiao Chen commented on HDFS-13035: ---------------------------------- [~andrew.wang] obviously has more weight to comment. The proposed relaxation of a+b for file owner to set feinfo SGTM. Question: what if the owner typo'ed and set a wrong xattr, then wanted to remove? Do we relax it for {{removeXAttr}} and \{{getXAttrs}} as well (which sounds fine too for xattr in general, but less so for fe info...)? > Owner should be allowed to set xattr if not already set. > -------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HDFS-13035 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-13035 > Project: Hadoop HDFS > Issue Type: Bug > Components: hdfs, namenode > Reporter: Rushabh S Shah > Priority: Major > > Motivation: This is needed to support encryption zones on WebhdfsFileSystem. > For writing into EZ directory, webhdfs client will encrypt data on client > side and will always write into /.reserved/raw/ directory so that datanode > will not encrypt since its writing to /.reserved/raw directory. > But then we have to somehow set crypto related x-attrs on the file. > Currently only super user is allowed to set x-attrs. > So I am proposing that the file owner(and superuser) should be allowed to set > crypto related x-attrs if they are already not set. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org