[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-12615?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16474747#comment-16474747
 ] 

Anu Engineer commented on HDFS-12615:
-------------------------------------

when you have 97 bug fixes to be made on a feature, I believe it is time to 
open up your branch. I have no issues with the check-ins, but I just want them 
to come in a stable transactional faction. Some of the work that you are 
proposing including security and DN interaction with Router are indeed 
fundamental changes. Just to point out, the security work has a patch and it 
[~daryn] requested a design doc. 

My request is to move all Phase-2 items of RBF to a branch and merge when it is 
ready. Right now, it seems that small changes are being intermingled with 
big-ticket items and directly committed to trunk. If this project made zero 
impact to the rest of the code, it would *not* be this concerned, but if we are 
making fundamental changes, let us bring it via a branch.

> Router-based HDFS federation phase 2
> ------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-12615
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-12615
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Íñigo Goiri
>            Assignee: Íñigo Goiri
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: RBF
>
> This umbrella JIRA tracks set of improvements over the Router-based HDFS 
> federation (HDFS-10467).



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org

Reply via email to