[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-49?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16475204#comment-16475204
]
Anu Engineer commented on HDDS-49:
----------------------------------
[~msingh] Had chat with [~jnp] and he brought a good point. He was suggesting
that we can support this feature via adding a new communication type,
XcieverServerGRPC and corrsponding client without any major modification.
Eventually once we have performance numbers from this grpc based pipeline we
can switch into this being default. This is similar to what we did for Ratis.
That way the older netty based code is not disturbed at all.
> Standalone protocol should use grpc in place of netty.
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HDDS-49
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-49
> Project: Hadoop Distributed Data Store
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Ozone Datanode
> Reporter: Mukul Kumar Singh
> Assignee: Mukul Kumar Singh
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 0.2.1
>
> Attachments: HDDS-49.001.patch, HDDS-49.002.patch, HDDS-49.003.patch,
> HDDS-49.004.patch
>
>
> Currently an Ozone client in standalone communicates with datanode over
> netty. However while using ratis, grpc is the default protocol.
> In order to reduce the number of rpc protocol and handling, this jira aims to
> convert the standalone protocol to use grpc.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
