[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-7967?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16607967#comment-16607967
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-7967:
---------------------------------

| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue}  0m  
0s{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} patch {color} | {color:red}  0m  8s{color} 
| {color:red} HDFS-7967 does not apply to branch-2.8. Rebase required? Wrong 
Branch? See https://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/HowToContribute for help. {color} |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| JIRA Issue | HDFS-7967 |
| JIRA Patch URL | 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12847070/HDFS-7967.branch-2.8.003.patch
 |
| Console output | 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/25006/console |
| Powered by | Apache Yetus 0.8.0   http://yetus.apache.org |


This message was automatically generated.



> Reduce the performance impact of the balancer
> ---------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-7967
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-7967
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: namenode
>    Affects Versions: 2.0.0-alpha
>            Reporter: Daryn Sharp
>            Assignee: Daryn Sharp
>            Priority: Critical
>         Attachments: HDFS-7967-branch-2.8.patch, HDFS-7967-branch-2.patch, 
> HDFS-7967.branch-2-1.patch, HDFS-7967.branch-2.001.patch, 
> HDFS-7967.branch-2.002.patch, HDFS-7967.branch-2.8-1.patch, 
> HDFS-7967.branch-2.8.001.patch, HDFS-7967.branch-2.8.002.patch, 
> HDFS-7967.branch-2.8.003.patch
>
>
> The balancer needs to query for blocks to move from overly full DNs.  The 
> block lookup is extremely inefficient.  An iterator of the node's blocks is 
> created from the iterators of its storages' blocks.  A random number is 
> chosen corresponding to how many blocks will be skipped via the iterator.  
> Each skip requires costly scanning of triplets.
> The current design also only considers node imbalances while ignoring 
> imbalances within the nodes's storages.  A more efficient and intelligent 
> design may eliminate the costly skipping of blocks via round-robin selection 
> of blocks from the storages based on remaining capacity.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org

Reply via email to