[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-14045?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16684619#comment-16684619
 ] 

Jiandan Yang  commented on HDFS-14045:
--------------------------------------

Hi, [~xkrogen] 
I have updated patch according to your review comments, please help reviewing 
again.

> Use different metrics in DataNode to better measure latency of 
> heartbeat/blockReports/incrementalBlockReports of Active/Standby NN
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-14045
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-14045
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: datanode
>            Reporter: Jiandan Yang 
>            Assignee: Jiandan Yang 
>            Priority: Major
>         Attachments: HDFS-14045.001.patch, HDFS-14045.002.patch, 
> HDFS-14045.003.patch, HDFS-14045.004.patch, HDFS-14045.005.patch, 
> HDFS-14045.006.patch, HDFS-14045.007.patch, HDFS-14045.008.patch
>
>
> Currently DataNode uses same metrics to measure rpc latency of NameNode, but 
> Active and Standby usually have different performance at the same time, 
> especially in large cluster. For example, rpc latency of Standby is very long 
> when Standby is catching up editlog. We may misunderstand the state of HDFS. 
> Using different metrics for Active and standby can help us obtain more 
> precise metric data.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org

Reply via email to