[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-14084?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16739734#comment-16739734
 ] 

Pranay Singh edited comment on HDFS-14084 at 1/10/19 9:48 PM:
--------------------------------------------------------------

The failures reported in the previous PATCH was attributed to use of same port 
number (-1) in RpcDetailedMetrics.create() [ Client.java ], so if more than one 
client used the same metric, the metric registry threw an exception stating 
that it's already in use. This PATCH fixes the issue by introducing a new API 
for RpcDetailedMetrics.create() that takes clientid (string) as argument 
instead of port#.

 

 


was (Author: pranay_singh):
The failures reported in the previous PATCH was attributed to use of same port 
number (-1) in RpcDetailedMetrics.create() [ Client.java ], so if more than one 
client used the same metric, the metric registry threw an exception stating 
that it's already in use. This PATCH fixes the issue by introducing a new API 
for RpcDetailedMetrics.create() that takes clientid (string) as argument 
instead of portID.

 

 

> Need for more stats in DFSClient
> --------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-14084
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-14084
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>    Affects Versions: 3.0.0
>            Reporter: Pranay Singh
>            Assignee: Pranay Singh
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: HDFS-14084.001.patch, HDFS-14084.002.patch, 
> HDFS-14084.003.patch, HDFS-14084.004.patch, HDFS-14084.005.patch, 
> HDFS-14084.006.patch, HDFS-14084.007.patch, HDFS-14084.008.patch, 
> HDFS-14084.009.patch, HDFS-14084.010.patch, HDFS-14084.011.patch, 
> HDFS-14084.012.patch
>
>
> The usage of HDFS has changed from being used as a map-reduce filesystem, now 
> it's becoming more of like a general purpose filesystem. In most of the cases 
> there are issues with the Namenode so we have metrics to know the workload or 
> stress on Namenode.
> However, there is a need to have more statistics collected for different 
> operations/RPCs in DFSClient to know which RPC operations are taking longer 
> time or to know what is the frequency of the operation.These statistics can 
> be exposed to the users of DFS Client and they can periodically log or do 
> some sort of flow control if the response is slow. This will also help to 
> isolate HDFS issue in a mixed environment where on a node say we have Spark, 
> HBase and Impala running together. We can check the throughput of different 
> operation across client and isolate the problem caused because of noisy 
> neighbor or network congestion or shared JVM.
> We have dealt with several problems from the field for which there is no 
> conclusive evidence as to what caused the problem. If we had metrics or stats 
> in DFSClient we would be better equipped to solve such complex problems.
> List of jiras for reference:
> -------------------------
>  HADOOP-15538 HADOOP-15530 ( client side deadlock)



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org

Reply via email to