[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-699?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16754644#comment-16754644
 ] 

Sammi Chen commented on HDDS-699:
---------------------------------

Hi [~szetszwo], thanks for the comments.  For the NetworkTopology performance, 
at the beginning I thought most of the access are reads after the network 
topology is built, so a read write reentrant single netlock approach may not 
cause much performance penalty. If it will really cause big performance issue, 
then we'd better do some improvement. To make the InnerNode thread soft, I 
intend to introduce a google component ConcurrentLinkedHashMap to replace the  
ConcurrentHashMap. The component is never used in Hadoop and it has "Apache 
License 2.0". I assume it's OK to use it in Ozone. Let me know if there is 
other opinions.  

> Detect Ozone Network topology
> -----------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDDS-699
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-699
>             Project: Hadoop Distributed Data Store
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>            Reporter: Xiaoyu Yao
>            Assignee: Sammi Chen
>            Priority: Major
>         Attachments: HDDS-699.00.patch, HDDS-699.01.patch
>
>
> Traditionally this has been implemented in Hadoop via script or customizable 
> java class. One thing we want to add here is the flexible multi-level support 
> instead of fixed levels like DC/Rack/NG/Node.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org

Reply via email to