Eric Yang created HDDS-1455:
-------------------------------
Summary: Inconsistent naming convention with Ozone Kerberos
configuration
Key: HDDS-1455
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-1455
Project: Hadoop Distributed Data Store
Issue Type: Sub-task
Reporter: Eric Yang
In SetupSecureOzone.md, the naming convention for keytab files are different
from code.
{code}
hdds.scm.http.kerberos.keytab
ozone.om.http.kerberos.keytab
{code}
In ozone-default.xml, it is looking for:
{code}
hdds.scm.http.kerberos.keytab
ozone.om.http.kerberos.keytab.file
{code}
For the non http version of keytab, they are branded as:
{code}
hdds.scm.kerberos.keytab.file
ozone.om.kerberos.keytab.file
{code}
It is best to shorten the name to remove .file suffix from the code to be
consistent with Hadoop naming convention. The second nitpick is hdds and ozone
prefix. Is there a good reason to have distinct prefix for both that work
closely together? How about hadoop.ozone prefix? From usability point of
view, the current prefix are very confusing.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
