[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-14611?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16875281#comment-16875281
 ] 

Konstantin Shvachko commented on HDFS-14611:
--------------------------------------------

Looks reasonable overall, simpler than the previous approach, and preserves 
compatibility, which is the key point. Minor comments:
# {{SaslDataTransferServer}} - some unused imports still need to be reverted
# {{public byte[] createPassword(BlockTokenIdentifier identifier)}} - may not 
need to be public
# Update JavaDoc for the new parameter in constructor 
{{BlockTokenSecretManager()}}
# Also check the checkstyle warnings.

> Move handshake secret field from Token to BlockAccessToken
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-14611
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-14611
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: hdfs
>            Reporter: Chen Liang
>            Assignee: Chen Liang
>            Priority: Blocker
>         Attachments: HDFS-14611.001.patch, HDFS-14611.002.patch
>
>
> Currently the handshake secret is included in Token, but conceptually this 
> should belong to Block Access Token only. More importantly, having this field 
> in Token could potentially break compatibility. Moreover, having this field 
> as part of Block Access Token also means we may not need to encrypt this 
> field anymore, because block access token is already encrypted.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org

Reply via email to