[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-1661?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16876667#comment-16876667
]
Anu Engineer commented on HDDS-1661:
------------------------------------
I think that would be too early now. Either Ozone should be as good as HDFS or
HDFS should start using HDDS.These are the two possible out comes we are
looking for.
HDFS cannot start using HDDS since HDFS did not want to take dependency on
something that is not prove in the field.
IMHO, the best time to have a discussion about should we move HDFS over HDDS
or is Ozone good enough? Needs us to prove that HDDS is stable and performant.
So perhaps after the Ozone GA?
> Consolidate hadoop-hdds and hadoop-ozone into hadoop-ozone-project
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HDDS-1661
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-1661
> Project: Hadoop Distributed Data Store
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Eric Yang
> Priority: Major
>
> Ozone source code is some what fragmented in Hadoop source code. The current
> code looks like:
> {code}
> hadoop/pom.ozone.xml
> ├── hadoop-hdds
> └── hadoop-ozone
> {code}
> It is helpful to consolidate the project into high level grouping such as:
> {code}
> hadoop
> └── hadoop-ozone-project/pom.xml
> └── hadoop-ozone-project/hadoop-hdds
> └── hadoop-ozone-project/hadoop-ozone
> {code}
> This allows user to build ozone from hadoop-ozone-project directory.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
