[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1972?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13160533#comment-13160533
 ] 

Suresh Srinivas commented on HDFS-1972:
---------------------------------------

BTW looking through your proposal, you cannot handle the case where a datanode 
joins the cluster and only sees during split brain, one of the active nodes 
(that has remained unexpectedly remained in active state). Hence either we 
depend on ZK to provide the answer and assume that fencing has taken care of 
shutting down the errant active.
                
> HA: Datanode fencing mechanism
> ------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-1972
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1972
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: data-node, name-node
>            Reporter: Suresh Srinivas
>            Assignee: Todd Lipcon
>
> In high availability setup, with an active and standby namenode, there is a 
> possibility of two namenodes sending commands to the datanode. The datanode 
> must honor commands from only the active namenode and reject the commands 
> from standby, to prevent corruption. This invariant must be complied with 
> during fail over and other states such as split brain. This jira addresses 
> issues related to this, design of the solution and implementation.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to