[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15288?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17111386#comment-17111386
 ] 

Íñigo Goiri commented on HDFS-15288:
------------------------------------

OK, let's keep the 0 to 1 range for consistency; let's add the meaning of 0 and 
1 to the xml though.
For the long key name... not sure, to be honest; ideally we could have sub 
configuration definitions but not sure how clean that is in the context of 
other settings.

> Add Available Space Rack Fault Tolerant BPP
> -------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-15288
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15288
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Ayush Saxena
>            Assignee: Ayush Saxena
>            Priority: Major
>         Attachments: HDFS-15288-01.patch, HDFS-15288-02.patch
>
>
> The Present {{AvailableSpaceBlockPlacementPolicy}} extends the Default Block 
> Placement policy, which makes it apt for Replicated files. But not very 
> efficient for EC files, which by default use. 
> {{BlockPlacementPolicyRackFaultTolerant}}. So propose a to add new BPP having 
> similar optimization as ASBPP where as keeping the spread of Blocks to max 
> racks, i.e as RackFaultTolerantBPP.
> This could extend {{BlockPlacementPolicyRackFaultTolerant}}, rather than the 
> {{BlockPlacementPOlicyDefault}} like ASBPP and keep other logics of 
> optimization same as ASBPP



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org

Reply via email to