[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15659?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17223829#comment-17223829
 ] 

Ayush Saxena commented on HDFS-15659:
-------------------------------------

In general you can't even revert a released Jira, but if we find a way which 
appears more promising in later stages, we can change the old code in a new 
Jira(provided the folks who did earlier doesn't object)

Here also, we can sort out things in one or may be two new Jiras rather than 
bothering the resolved jiras, I am absolutely fine, going this way. 

Just one thing we might need separate patches for the other branches, direct 
cherry-pick might not work(little more work for the contributor), and have a 
check that we don't land up breaking any test relying on this conf to be turned 
on.

If in the end jenkins and everyone stays happy. We can happily go ahead with 
this. :)

 

> Set dfs.namenode.redundancy.considerLoad to false in MiniDFSCluster
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-15659
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15659
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: test
>            Reporter: Akira Ajisaka
>            Priority: Major
>
> dfs.namenode.redundancy.considerLoad is true by default and it is causing 
> many test failures. Let's disable it in MiniDFSCluster.
> Originally reported by [~weichiu]: 
> https://github.com/apache/hadoop/pull/2410#pullrequestreview-516144442
> {quote}
> i've certain seen this option causing test failures in the past.
> Maybe we should turn it off by default in MiniDDFSCluster, and only enable it 
> for specific tests.
> {quote}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org

Reply via email to