[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-16000?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

zhu updated HDFS-16000:
-----------------------
    Attachment: HDFS-16000

> HDFS : Rename performance optimization
> --------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-16000
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-16000
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: hdfs, namenode
>    Affects Versions: 3.1.4, 3.3.1
>            Reporter: zhu
>            Assignee: zhu
>            Priority: Major
>         Attachments: 20210428-143238.svg, 20210428-171635-lambda.svg, 
> HDFS-16000
>
>
> It takes a long time to move a large directory with rename. For example, it 
> takes about 40 seconds to move a 1000W directory. When a large amount of data 
> is deleted to the trash, the move large directory will occur when the recycle 
> bin makes checkpoint. In addition, the user may also actively trigger the 
> move large directory operation, which will cause the NameNode to lock too 
> long and be killed by Zkfc. Through the flame graph, it is found that the 
> main time consuming is to create the EnumCounters object.
> *I think the following two points can optimize the efficiency of rename 
> execution*
>  * 
> h3. *QuotaCount calculation time-consuming optimization:*
>  # 
>  ## Create a QuotaCounts object in the calculation directory quotaCount, and 
> pass the quotaCount to the next calculation function through a parameter each 
> time, so as to avoid creating an EnumCounters object for each calculation.
>  ## In addition, through the flame graph, it is found that using lambda to 
> modify QuotaCounts takes longer than the ordinary method, so the ordinary 
> method is used to modify the QuotaCounts count.
>  * 
> h3. Rename logic optimization:
>  # 
>  ## Regardless of whether the rename operation is the source directory and 
> the target directory, the quota count must be calculated three times. The 
> first time, check whether the moved directory exceeds the target directory 
> quota, the second time, calculate the mobile directory quota to update the 
> source directory quota, and the third time, calculate the mobile directory 
> configuration update to the target directory.
> I think some of the above three quota quota calculations are unnecessary. For 
> example, if all parent directories of the source directory and target 
> directory are not configured with quota, there is no need to calculate 
> quotaCount. Even if both the source directory and the target directory use 
> quota, there is no need to calculate the quota three times. The calculation 
> logic for the first and third times is the same, and it only needs to be 
> calculated once.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org

Reply via email to