[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-16456?focusedWorklogId=756899&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:worklog-tabpanel#worklog-756899 ]
ASF GitHub Bot logged work on HDFS-16456: ----------------------------------------- Author: ASF GitHub Bot Created on: 14/Apr/22 09:43 Start Date: 14/Apr/22 09:43 Worklog Time Spent: 10m Work Description: tasanuma commented on PR #4126: URL: https://github.com/apache/hadoop/pull/4126#issuecomment-1098943763 Merged. Thanks for your contribution, @lfxy! Issue Time Tracking ------------------- Worklog Id: (was: 756899) Time Spent: 2h (was: 1h 50m) > EC: Decommission a rack with only on dn will fail when the rack number is > equal with replication > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HDFS-16456 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-16456 > Project: Hadoop HDFS > Issue Type: Bug > Components: ec, namenode > Affects Versions: 3.4.0 > Reporter: caozhiqiang > Assignee: caozhiqiang > Priority: Critical > Labels: pull-request-available > Attachments: HDFS-16456.001.patch, HDFS-16456.002.patch, > HDFS-16456.003.patch, HDFS-16456.004.patch, HDFS-16456.005.patch, > HDFS-16456.006.patch, HDFS-16456.007.patch, HDFS-16456.008.patch, > HDFS-16456.009.patch, HDFS-16456.010.patch > > Time Spent: 2h > Remaining Estimate: 0h > > In below scenario, decommission will fail by TOO_MANY_NODES_ON_RACK reason: > # Enable EC policy, such as RS-6-3-1024k. > # The rack number in this cluster is equal with or less than the replication > number(9) > # A rack only has one DN, and decommission this DN. > The root cause is in > BlockPlacementPolicyRackFaultTolerant::getMaxNodesPerRack() function, it will > give a limit parameter maxNodesPerRack for choose targets. In this scenario, > the maxNodesPerRack is 1, which means each rack can only be chosen one > datanode. > {code:java} > protected int[] getMaxNodesPerRack(int numOfChosen, int numOfReplicas) { > ... > // If more replicas than racks, evenly spread the replicas. > // This calculation rounds up. > int maxNodesPerRack = (totalNumOfReplicas - 1) / numOfRacks + 1; > return new int[] {numOfReplicas, maxNodesPerRack}; > } {code} > int maxNodesPerRack = (totalNumOfReplicas - 1) / numOfRacks + 1; > here will be called, where totalNumOfReplicas=9 and numOfRacks=9 > When we decommission one dn which is only one node in its rack, the > chooseOnce() in BlockPlacementPolicyRackFaultTolerant::chooseTargetInOrder() > will throw NotEnoughReplicasException, but the exception will not be caught > and fail to fallback to chooseEvenlyFromRemainingRacks() function. > When decommission, after choose targets, verifyBlockPlacement() function will > return the total rack number contains the invalid rack, and > BlockPlacementStatusDefault::isPlacementPolicySatisfied() will return false > and it will also cause decommission fail. > {code:java} > public BlockPlacementStatus verifyBlockPlacement(DatanodeInfo[] locs, > int numberOfReplicas) { > if (locs == null) > locs = DatanodeDescriptor.EMPTY_ARRAY; > if (!clusterMap.hasClusterEverBeenMultiRack()) { > // only one rack > return new BlockPlacementStatusDefault(1, 1, 1); > } > // Count locations on different racks. > Set<String> racks = new HashSet<>(); > for (DatanodeInfo dn : locs) { > racks.add(dn.getNetworkLocation()); > } > return new BlockPlacementStatusDefault(racks.size(), numberOfReplicas, > clusterMap.getNumOfRacks()); > } {code} > {code:java} > public boolean isPlacementPolicySatisfied() { > return requiredRacks <= currentRacks || currentRacks >= totalRacks; > }{code} > According to the above description, we should make the below modify to fix it: > # In startDecommission() or stopDecommission(), we should also change the > numOfRacks in class NetworkTopology. Or choose targets may fail for the > maxNodesPerRack is too small. And even choose targets success, > isPlacementPolicySatisfied will also return false cause decommission fail. > # In BlockPlacementPolicyRackFaultTolerant::chooseTargetInOrder(), the first > chooseOnce() function should also be put in try..catch..., or it will not > fallback to call chooseEvenlyFromRemainingRacks() when throw exception. > # In verifyBlockPlacement, we need to remove invalid racks from total > numOfRacks, or isPlacementPolicySatisfied() will return false and cause fail > to reconstruct data. > > -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.1#820001) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org