[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-16093?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17528889#comment-17528889
]
Renukaprasad C commented on HDFS-16093:
---------------------------------------
[~Daniel Ma] Thanks for reporting the issue. Thanks [~hexiaoqiao] [~sodonnell]
[~tomscut] for review & feedback.
I do agree with [~hexiaoqiao] / [~tomscut] / [~sodonnell] , instead of
excluding the Decommissioning (Decommissioned), this can be placed last. And
read will be success with other normal DNs.
Are you still working on this solution?
> DataNodes under decommission will still be returned to the client via
> getLocatedBlocks, so the client may request decommissioning datanodes to read
> which will cause badly competation on disk IO.
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HDFS-16093
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-16093
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Affects Versions: 3.3.1
> Reporter: Daniel Ma
> Assignee: Daniel Ma
> Priority: Critical
>
> DataNodes under decommission will still be returned to the client via
> getLocatedBlocks, so the client may request decommissioning datanodes to read
> which will cause badly competation on disk IO.
> Therefore, datanodes under decommission should be removed from the return
> list of getLocatedBlocks api.
> !image-2021-06-29-10-50-44-739.png!
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.7#820007)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
