[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-16830?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17627073#comment-17627073 ]
zhengchenyu commented on HDFS-16830: ------------------------------------ Hi, in our production cluster, huge msync is introduced to active. I think we still should continue two work: (1) propagate state id as client need, avoid msync to namenode which is not used by client. (2) share msync, reduce the mysnc operations. [~simbadzina] How about my proposal? > Improve router msync operation > ------------------------------ > > Key: HDFS-16830 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-16830 > Project: Hadoop HDFS > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: namenode, rbf > Reporter: zhengchenyu > Assignee: zhengchenyu > Priority: Major > -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org