[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-16830?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17627073#comment-17627073
]
zhengchenyu commented on HDFS-16830:
------------------------------------
Hi, in our production cluster, huge msync is introduced to active.
I think we still should continue two work:
(1) propagate state id as client need, avoid msync to namenode which is not
used by client.
(2) share msync, reduce the mysnc operations.
[~simbadzina] How about my proposal?
> Improve router msync operation
> ------------------------------
>
> Key: HDFS-16830
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-16830
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: namenode, rbf
> Reporter: zhengchenyu
> Assignee: zhengchenyu
> Priority: Major
>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
