[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-16958?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17705256#comment-17705256
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on HDFS-16958:
---------------------------------------
tasanuma commented on PR #5489:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hadoop/pull/5489#issuecomment-1484795648
@zhangshuyan0 Thanks for your explanation. So the current implementation is
correct?
> EC: Fix bug in processing EC excess redundancy
> -----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HDFS-16958
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-16958
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Shuyan Zhang
> Assignee: Shuyan Zhang
> Priority: Major
> Labels: pull-request-available
>
> When processing excess redundancy, the number of internal blocks is computed
> by traversing `nonExcess`. This way is not accurate, because `nonExcess`
> excludes replicas in abnormal states, such as corrupt ones, or maintenance
> ones. `numOfTarget` may be smaller than the actual value, which will result
> in inaccurate generated `excessTypes`.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
