[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-17111?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17746554#comment-17746554
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on HDFS-17111:
---------------------------------------

xinglin commented on code in PR #5860:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hadoop/pull/5860#discussion_r1272550379


##########
hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs-rbf/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hdfs/server/federation/router/RouterClientProtocol.java:
##########
@@ -264,7 +264,7 @@ public HdfsFileStatus create(String src, FsPermission 
masked,
       String clientName, EnumSetWritable<CreateFlag> flag,
       boolean createParent, short replication, long blockSize,
       CryptoProtocolVersion[] supportedVersions, String ecPolicyName,
-      String storagePolicy)
+      String storagePolicyName)

Review Comment:
   I don't have context regarding how this practice came into play. In my 
opinion, we should be open to include such trivial improvements. 
   
   - It is clear from retrospective that this is a trivial rename improvement. 
There is no confusion that such a trivial change would cause.
   
   Otherwise, we would have to create a separate PR to get this trivial change 
in, which would
   - Add more work to the PR author
   - Add more review load.
   
   Even worse, given such a trivial improvement, people may simply don't want 
to do it, as a separate PR. 





> RBF: Optimize msync to only call nameservices that have observer reads 
> enabled.
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-17111
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-17111
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Simbarashe Dzinamarira
>            Assignee: Simbarashe Dzinamarira
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: pull-request-available
>
> Right now when a client MSYNCs to the router, the call is fanned out to all 
> nameservices. We only need to proxy the msync to nameservices that have 
> observer reads configured.
> We can do this either by adding a new config for the admin to specify which 
> nameservices have CRS configured, or we can try to automatically detect these.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to