[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-17218?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17773523#comment-17773523 ]
Xiaoqiao He commented on HDFS-17218: ------------------------------------ {quote}6. dn restarts will FBR is executed (processFirstBlockReport will not be executed here, processReport will be executed). since block1 is not a new block, the processExtraRedundancy logic will not be executed. 7. so the block of dn1 will always exist in excessRedundancyMap (until HA switch is performed).{quote} Would you mind to attach code snippet that shows the current implements about 6 & 7? Thanks. > NameNode should remove its excess blocks from the ExcessRedundancyMap When a > DN registers > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HDFS-17218 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-17218 > Project: Hadoop HDFS > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: namanode > Reporter: Haiyang Hu > Assignee: Haiyang Hu > Priority: Major > > Currently found that DN will lose all pending DNA_INVALIDATE blocks if it > restarts. > *Root case* > Current DN enables asynchronously deletion, it have many pending deletion > blocks in memory. > when DN restarts, these cached blocks may be lost. it causes some blocks in > the excess map in the namenode to be leaked and this will result in many > blocks having more replicas then expected. > *solution* > Consider NameNode should remove its excess blocks from the > ExcessRedundancyMap When a DN registers, > this approach will ensure that when processing the DN's full block report, > the 'processExtraRedundancy' can be performed according to the actual of the > blocks. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org