[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-17290?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17798382#comment-17798382
]
Lei Yang edited comment on HDFS-17290 at 12/18/23 11:48 PM:
------------------------------------------------------------
[~goiri] [~simbadzina] Can you please review this and let me know if you have
any concerns?
fyi [~mccormickt12]
was (Author: JIRAUSER286942):
[~goiri] [~simbadzina] Can you please review this and let me know if you have
any concerns?
> HDFS: add client rpc backoff metrics due to disconnection from lowest
> priority queue
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HDFS-17290
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-17290
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 2.10.0, 3.4.0
> Reporter: Lei Yang
> Assignee: Lei Yang
> Priority: Major
> Labels: pull-request-available
>
> Clients are backoff when rpcs cannot be enqueued. However there are different
> scenarios when backoff could happen. Currently there is no way to
> differenciate whether a backoff happened due to lowest prio+disconnection or
> queue overflow from higher ones. IPC server just emits a monolithic metrics
> for all the backoffs.
> Example:
> # Client are directly enqueued into lowest priority queue and backoff when
> lowest queue is full. Client are expected to disconnect from namenode.
> # Client are enqueued into non-lowest priority queue and overflowed all the
> way down to lowest priority queue and back off. In this case, connection
> between client and namenode remains open.
> We would like to add metrics for #1
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
