[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-17341?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

ASF GitHub Bot updated HDFS-17341:
----------------------------------
    Labels: pull-request-available  (was: )

> Support dedicated user queues in Namenode FairCallQueue
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-17341
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-17341
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: namenode
>    Affects Versions: 2.10.0, 3.4.0
>            Reporter: Lei Yang
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: pull-request-available
>
> Some service users today in namenode like ETL, metrics collection, ad-hoc 
> users that are critical to run business critical job accounts for many 
> traffic in namenode and shouldn't be throttled the same way as other 
> individual users in FCQ.
> There is feature in namenode to always prioritize some service users to not 
> subject to FCQ scheduling. (Those users are always p0) but it is not perfect 
> and it doesn't account for traffic surge from those users.
> The idea is to allocate dedicated rpc queues for those service users with 
> bounded queue capacity and allocate processing weight for those users. If 
> queue is full, those users are expected to backoff and retry.
>  
> New configs:
> {code:java}
> "faircallqueue.reserved.users"; // list of service users that are assigned to 
> dedicated queue
> "faircallqueue.reserved.users.max"; // max number of service users allowed
> "faircallqueue.reserved.users.capacities"; // custom queue capacities for 
> each service user
> "faircallqueue.multiplexer.reserved.weights"; // processing weights for each 
> dedicated queue{code}
>  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org

Reply via email to