[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-17438?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17832407#comment-17832407
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on HDFS-17438:
---------------------------------------

KeeProMise commented on PR #6655:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hadoop/pull/6655#issuecomment-2027940379

   @goiri hi, hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs-rbf in trunk has 1 extant 
spotbugs warnings, do you have any suggestions?




> RBF: The newest STANDBY and UNAVAILABLE nn should be the lowest priority.
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-17438
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-17438
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Jian Zhang
>            Assignee: Jian Zhang
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: pull-request-available
>         Attachments: HDFS-17438.001.patch
>
>
> At present, when the status of all namenodes in an ns in the router is the 
> same, the namenode which is the newest reported will be placed at the top of 
> the cache. when the client accesses the ns through the router, it will first 
> access the namenode.
> If multiple namenodes in this route are in an active state, or if there are 
> namenodes with multiple observer states, the existing logic is not a problem, 
> because the newest reported active or observer state namenode have a higher 
> probability of being true active or observer compared to the namenode that 
> reported active or observer state a long time ago.
> Similarly, the newest reported namenode with a status of standby or 
> unavailable has a higher probability of being a standby or unavailable 
> namenode compared to the namenode reported with a status of standby or 
> unavailable a long time ago. Therefore, the newest nn reported as standby or 
> unavailable status should have a lower priority for access, the oldest nn 
> reported as standby or unavailable status should have a higher priority for 
> access.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org

Reply via email to