[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-17476?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=18023366#comment-18023366
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on HDFS-17476:
---------------------------------------
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #6747:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hadoop/pull/6747#issuecomment-3342139986
We're closing this stale PR because it has been open for 100 days with no
activity. This isn't a judgement on the merit of the PR in any way. It's just a
way of keeping the PR queue manageable.
If you feel like this was a mistake, or you would like to continue working
on it, please feel free to re-open it and ask for a committer to remove the
stale tag and review again.
Thanks all for your contribution.
> fix: False positive "Observer Node is too far behind" due to long overflow.
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HDFS-17476
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-17476
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Jian Zhang
> Assignee: Jian Zhang
> Priority: Critical
> Labels: pull-request-available
> Attachments: HDFS-17476.patch, image-2024-04-18-10-57-10-481.png
>
>
> In the code GlobalStateIdContext#receiveRequestState(), if clientStateId is a
> small negative number, clientStateId-serverStateId may be greater than
> （ESTIMATED_TRANSACTIONS_PER_SECOND due to overflow
> * TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS.toSeconds(clientWaitTime)
> * ESTIMATED_SERVER_TIME_MULTIPLIER）,
> resulting in false positives that Observer Node is too far behind.
> !image-2024-04-18-10-57-10-481.png|width=742,height=110!
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
