[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-17327?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=18024621#comment-18024621
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on HDFS-17327:
---------------------------------------
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #6421:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hadoop/pull/6421#issuecomment-3367612770
We're closing this stale PR because it has been open for 100 days with no
activity. This isn't a judgement on the merit of the PR in any way. It's just a
way of keeping the PR queue manageable.
If you feel like this was a mistake, or you would like to continue working
on it, please feel free to re-open it and ask for a committer to remove the
stale tag and review again.
Thanks all for your contribution.
> Fix ReconfigurableBase class's reconfigureProperty method judgment logic.
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HDFS-17327
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-17327
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Zhaobo Huang
> Assignee: Zhaobo Huang
> Priority: Major
> Labels: pull-request-available
>
> 1. If it is a null value, after reconfig, It may be that the current system
> value is in effect, not necessarily the default value.
> 2. {{ReconfigurableBase#reconfigureProperty}} judges the condition
> incorrectly, When the effectValue is not null, the system value needs to be
> changed.
> 3. In other words, certain variables actually have effected, but the current
> configuration of the system is refreshed to null.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
