[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-16626?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=18037557#comment-18037557
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on HDFS-16626:
---------------------------------------

github-actions[bot] closed pull request #4420: HDFS-16626. Under replicated 
blocks in dfsadmin report should contain pendingReconstruction‘s blocks
URL: https://github.com/apache/hadoop/pull/4420




> Under replicated blocks in dfsadmin report should contain 
> pendingReconstruction‘s blocks
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-16626
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-16626
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: ec, namenode
>    Affects Versions: 3.4.0
>            Reporter: caozhiqiang
>            Assignee: caozhiqiang
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: pull-request-available
>         Attachments: image-2022-06-08-18-30-13-757.png
>
>          Time Spent: 1h 40m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> In the output of command 'hdfs dfsadmin -report', the value of Under 
> replicated blocks and ec Low redundancy block groups only contains the block 
> number in BlockManager::neededReconstruction. It should also contain the 
> block number in BlockManager::pendingReconstruction, include the timeout 
> items. Specially, in some scenario, for example, decommission a dn with a lot 
> of ec blocks, there would be a lot blocks in  pendingReconstruction at a long 
> time but neededReconstruction's size may be 0. That will confuse user and 
> they can't access the real decommissioning progress.
> {code:java}
> Configured Capacity: 1036741707829248 (942.91 TB)
> Present Capacity: 983872491622400 (894.83 TB)
> DFS Remaining: 974247450424426 (886.07 TB)
> DFS Used: 9625041197974 (8.75 TB)
> DFS Used%: 0.98%
> Replicated Blocks:
>     Under replicated blocks: 0
>     Blocks with corrupt replicas: 0
>     Missing blocks: 0
>     Missing blocks (with replication factor 1): 0
>     Low redundancy blocks with highest priority to recover: 0
>     Pending deletion blocks: 0
> Erasure Coded Block Groups:
>     Low redundancy block groups: 3481
>     Block groups with corrupt internal blocks: 0
>     Missing block groups: 0
>     Low redundancy blocks with highest priority to recover: 0
>     Pending deletion blocks: 245 {code}
> The below graph show the metrics monitor of under_replicated_blocks and 
> pending_replicated_blocks in decommissioning a datanode process. The value of 
> pending_replicated_blocks would not be included in dfsadmin report.
> !image-2022-06-08-18-30-13-757.png|width=836,height=157!



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to