[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-17868?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=18048717#comment-18048717
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on HDFS-17868:
---------------------------------------

eubnara commented on code in PR #8159:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hadoop/pull/8159#discussion_r2657073710


##########
hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hdfs/server/namenode/NameNode.java:
##########
@@ -2363,8 +2375,15 @@ protected String reconfigurePropertyImpl(String 
property, String newVal)
             DFS_NAMENODE_REPLICATION_WORK_MULTIPLIER_PER_ITERATION)
         || 
property.equals(DFS_NAMENODE_RECONSTRUCTION_PENDING_TIMEOUT_SEC_KEY)) {
       return reconfReplicationParameters(newVal, property);
-    } else if (property.equals(DFS_BLOCK_REPLICATOR_CLASSNAME_KEY) || property
-        .equals(DFS_BLOCK_PLACEMENT_EC_CLASSNAME_KEY)) {
+    } else if (property.equals(DFS_BLOCK_REPLICATOR_CLASSNAME_KEY)
+        || property.equals(DFS_BLOCK_PLACEMENT_EC_CLASSNAME_KEY)
+        || property.equals(DFS_BLOCK_REPLICATOR_CROSS_DC_ASYNC_ENABLED_KEY)
+        || 
property.equals(DFS_BLOCK_REPLICATOR_CROSS_DC_PREFERRED_DATACENTER_KEY)
+        || 
property.equals(DFS_BLOCK_REPLICATOR_CROSS_DC_BANDWIDTH_LIMIT_MB_KEY)
+        || 
property.equals(DFS_BLOCK_REPLICATOR_CROSS_DC_BANDWIDTH_REFILL_PERIOD_SEC_KEY)
+        || property.equals(DFS_BLOCK_REPLICATOR_CROSS_DC_SYNC_PATHS_KEY)
+        || 
property.equals(DFS_BLOCK_REPLICATOR_CROSS_DC_LIMITED_SYNC_PATHS_KEY)

Review Comment:
   In order to change configurations without restarting NameNode, I added 
`BlockPlacementStatusWithCrossDC` related configurations here.
   However, if you change multiple configurations simultaneously and 
reconfigure it, `reconfBlockPlacementPolicy()` called multiple times.





> introduce BlockPlacementPolicyCrossDC for multi datacenter stretched hdfs 
> cluster
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-17868
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-17868
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: block placement
>            Reporter: YUBI LEE
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: pull-request-available
>
> I was inspired by the ideas presented in 
> https://dan.naver.com/25/sessions/692 and 
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1h4k_Dbt0t8 and implemented a new block 
> placement policy called BlockPlacementPolicyCrossDC.
> Thanks to [~acedia28] for the original ideas. It would be great if 
> [~acedia28] could share an improved or more mature version of this block 
> placement policy.
> This implementation introduces the following configuration options
> (default values are shown in parentheses):
> {code}
> dfs.block.replicator.cross.dc.async.enabled (false)
> dfs.block.replicator.cross.dc.preferred.datacenter
> dfs.block.replicator.cross.dc.bandwidth.limit.mb (5120)
> dfs.block.replicator.cross.dc.bandwidth.refill.period.sec (1)
> dfs.block.replicator.cross.dc.sync.paths
> dfs.block.replicator.cross.dc.limited.sync.paths
> {code}
> Based on the ideas from the session mentioned above, this policy supports 
> three different HDFS block write modes:
> 1. Synchronous write
> The standard HDFS behavior, where block replicas are synchronously written to 
> all target DataNodes.
> 2. Limited synchronous write
> Uses bucket4j to control cross-datacenter traffic.
> Writes below the configured threshold are performed synchronously, while 
> writes exceeding the threshold fall back to asynchronous replication.
> 3. Asynchronous write
> The client is initially given only DataNode candidates located in the same 
> datacenter.
> Any under-replicas are created later through background HDFS replication to 
> other datacenters.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to