[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-3404?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Aaron T. Myers updated HDFS-3404:
---------------------------------

    Attachment: HDFS-3404.patch

Here's an initial patch to make sure folks are OK with the approach. I'm still 
mulling over how best to write tests for this, which is a tad difficult on a 
single-node machine.

I tested this manually by setting up an HA setup where each NN itself binds to 
0.0.0.0, but has actual addresses for the other NN. It worked as expected.
                
> Make putImage in GetImageServlet infer remote address to fetch from
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-3404
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-3404
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>    Affects Versions: 2.0.0
>            Reporter: Aaron T. Myers
>            Assignee: Aaron T. Myers
>         Attachments: HDFS-3404.patch
>
>
> As it stands, daemons which perform checkpointing must determine their own 
> address on which they can be reached, so that the NN which they checkpoint 
> against knows what address to fetch a merged fsimage from. This causes 
> problems if, for example, the daemon performing checkpointing binds to 
> 0.0.0.0, and thus can't be sure of what address the NN can reach it at.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to