[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-3368?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13279930#comment-13279930
]
Aaron T. Myers commented on HDFS-3368:
--------------------------------------
bq. I was thinking about making it configurable, but decided not to introduce
yet another parameter. The value is chosen based on experimental data. If you
feel strongly about making it a configuration key, I can add an undocumented
parameter.
IMO, we should add a configuration option for it. Even if it's unlikely to
change, if someone does want to change it they'll thank us that they don't have
to change the code/recompile to do so.
> Missing blocks due to bad DataNodes comming up and down.
> --------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HDFS-3368
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-3368
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: name-node
> Affects Versions: 0.22.0, 1.0.0, 2.0.0, 3.0.0
> Reporter: Konstantin Shvachko
> Assignee: Konstantin Shvachko
> Attachments: blockDeletePolicy-0.22.patch,
> blockDeletePolicy-trunk.patch, blockDeletePolicy.patch
>
>
> All replicas of a block can be removed if bad DataNodes come up and down
> during cluster restart resulting in data loss.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
