[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-3513?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13291089#comment-13291089
 ] 

Daryn Sharp commented on HDFS-3513:
-----------------------------------

Would a more general, and possibly simpler solution, be to not disable the fs 
cache but instead track the last-use per user?  After the expiration period, 
the user's cached fs instances may be closed.  Would this address the comment 
about worst case the server will have a cached fs per user?  That scenario will 
lead to a lot of "leaked" fds because {{DFSClient}} will have sockets in the 
TIME_WAIT state (see MAPREDUCE-4323).
                
> HttpFS should cache filesystems
> -------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-3513
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-3513
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>    Affects Versions: 2.0.0-alpha
>            Reporter: Alejandro Abdelnur
>            Assignee: Alejandro Abdelnur
>         Attachments: HDFS-3513.patch, HDFS-3513.patch
>
>
> HttpFS opens and closes a FileSystem instance against the backend filesystem 
> (typically HDFS) on every request. The FileSystem caching is not used as it 
> does not have expiration/timeout and filesystem instances in there live 
> forever, for long running services like HttpFS this is not a good thing as it 
> would keep connections open to the NN.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to