[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-3389?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13292728#comment-13292728
]
Uma Maheswara Rao G commented on HDFS-3389:
-------------------------------------------
I was on vacation for last few days. So, I could not take a look on this.
Patch looking great Ivan, after your addition/correction to the doc.
One small nit:
zk1, zk2 & zk3, --> zk1, zk2 & zk3
I have seen
{code}
&{code} is directly reflectibng as is in doc.
I am +1 on this doc by updating above nit.
@Surendra, Could you please follow this doc and setup the HA cluster with
BookKeeper. Please don't use your prior knowledge while setting up the cluster
and provide your feedback if we have missed any thing to document here. Thanks
in advance Surendra, for your testing efforts.
> Document the BKJM usage in Namenode HA.
> ---------------------------------------
>
> Key: HDFS-3389
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-3389
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: name-node
> Affects Versions: 2.0.0-alpha, 3.0.0
> Reporter: Uma Maheswara Rao G
> Assignee: Uma Maheswara Rao G
> Attachments: HDFS-3389.diff, HDFS-3389.patch,
> HDFSHighAvailability.html
>
>
> As per the discussion in HDFS-234, We need clear documentation for BKJM usage
> in Namenode HA.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
