[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1783?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13398785#comment-13398785
 ] 

Lars Hofhansl commented on HDFS-1783:
-------------------------------------

Yes, that would be a good optimization.
I would propose starting with something simple, though (such as the current 
patch) and see how that behaves with HBase, and build confidence that it does 
not break things.
It's optional and the patch (IMHO) is low risk (only DFSOutputStream is 
changed, the rest for tests). Then we can think about further optimizations.

                
> Ability for HDFS client to write replicas in parallel
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-1783
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1783
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: hdfs client
>            Reporter: dhruba borthakur
>            Assignee: Lars Hofhansl
>         Attachments: HDFS-1783-trunk-v2.patch, HDFS-1783-trunk-v3.patch, 
> HDFS-1783-trunk-v4.patch, HDFS-1783-trunk-v5.patch, HDFS-1783-trunk.patch
>
>
> The current implementation of HDFS pipelines the writes to the three 
> replicas. This introduces some latency for realtime latency sensitive 
> applications. An alternate implementation that allows the client to write all 
> replicas in parallel gives much better response times to these applications. 

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to